Amazon has rather quietly patented "an electronic marketplace for used digital objects".  It is rather difficult to understate the importance of such a concept.  First Sale doesn't apply to digital content.  Amazon knows that, so they have smartly focused on patenting the marketplace tool, because they know the battle to sell used digital goods will be huge and very public.  All the major players will get involved, as this is one of the thorniest issues out there.

But for libraries, Amazon's willingness to get in the game represents a huge opportunity.  If Amazon takes this fight on, the most logical approach would be to advocate for some form of Digital First Sale, which means we could potentially have the leverage we need to "buy" ebooks at a market value rather than the ridiculous licenses eating up our budgets.

But of course, we should learn from Amazon.  They are probably patenting this ahead of time and will build the software before taking on the fight, because they need proof of concept.  They need to demonstrate how they will not hurt the market or increase piracy- something that only Douglas County and the handful of libraries who have followed their example have done.  Libraries all over need to realize the importance of Amazon's approach. They are patenting the marketplace and building the ecosystem ahead of time, because they know they can't get what they want without it.  Our approach has been exactly the opposite.  We ofter abstract arguments and ideas, but have nothing on the table.  

Finally, don't think this makes Amazon one of the good guys.  Please recognize that this is another salvo in the battle for control of the digital economy.  There is no way of knowing if it will actually help us, as Amazon's needs simply happen to meet some of ours at this point.  We need better solutions and leadership on this issue or we will again be left further out to pasture and even less relevant than before.  
 
 
Well that was short lived.  Random House does not mean "own" when they say "own."  Teleread has the story.  Like Amazon's web pages that uses terms like "purchase" and "your" fairly loosely, Randumb House thinks librarians must  themselves be pretty dumb.

We do not own our ebooks. Yet.
 
 
LJ has an article that will have librarians everywhere celebrating.  Random House has explicitly stated that libraries own ebooks when purchased through legitmate vendors.

This is huge.  But at the same time it may mean nothing, because the broader legal and technical environment may make this completely moot.  We need to be watching and looking for legal scholars to weigh in on the statement.  And we need to test them.  Start buying and treating ebooks like we own them rather than licensing.  We are considering that right now in our state.

Please read the article.  It may be the most important piece of news for libraries since ebooks became mainstream.
 
 
I was in Burlington, VT yesterday speaking about this very topic to a very savvy group of state librarians. Ironically, while I was gone one of my LIS students was talking about some of my ideas with her grandfather who is a retired econ professor with a deep commitment to the value of libraries.  I missed the article, but thanks to my student and her grandfather we have a great example of how the publisher's are deeply concerned about their survival in the face of Amazon's aggressive push to remove them from the picture.

This quote from one of Amazon's top execs puts the situation very bluntly, “The only really necessary people in the publishing process now are the writer and reader,”... He doesn't think libraries even rate.  David vs Goliath.  We have a few short years to become involved- otherwise Amazon and Apple with divide and conquer.
 
 
I just pushed a book one of our patrons wanted to his personal iPad that I synced to my Kindle cloud as a sort of beta test.  In addition to circulating about 30 ereaders that the library owns,and managing about 100 institutional iPads that have the Library's Kindle account on them, I have also installed my Kindle account on about 10 personal devices.  This group of people who have it are part of my beta test group who help me with all kinds of thorny questions and experiments.

Why would I sync an account to a privately owned device?  Well, because the answer to ebooks is not hardware based.  It's software.  Librarians are always asking me which ereader they should adopt, which company to work with, and my answer is, "It depends on your strategic vision and personal preferences."  Because that question is irrelevant if we have the right software.  I am working towards a scenario where libraries own their own ebooks.  By "own" I mean host their content where they choose.  If they choose the Amazon cloud, so be it, but they could also host the content on their own servers (theoretically).  The real issue is delivery and content management.

My vision is that libraries will be able to compete with Google by offering delivery to every device and patron at the moment of need- or want.  The gentleman I just delivered a nonfiction book to was in a meeting, heard about a book that sounded valuable, emailed me the title, and I pushed the book to his particular iPad immediately.

The value of this type of management model cannot be overemphasized. I have been using these devices for four year now with our patrons.  Ebooks and readers have so much potential for improving our services on so many levels, but their ability to make us competitive again is what really matters.  Google cannot get my patron the book immediately unless he buys it himself.  Many patrons are loath to do this, but I am willing to buy the titles because we are a library and are always buying titles.  By creating a crowd sourced patron driven acquisition model, and syncing personal devices to the library cloud we are suddenly able to deliver a service other electronic services and resources cannot.  This is the libraries advantage over browsers and the internet in the new ebook world, and this is why I have been experimenting with syncing my account to personal devices.

It also does wonders for our image.  The library on campus is now one of the main "go to" places.  We are faster, more fluid, and give our patrons a collective power they lack on their own.  People expect the library to have answers and ideas before anyone or any other institution on campus.  Creating a new image for libraries is obviously important, and we want one that is powerful and pleasing to our patrons.  I cannot tell you how many times I have seen one of these types of transactions take place, and seen a new understanding of the library dawn on the face of the patron we helped.  I expect to see it now.

This is one of the advantages ebooks offer libraries.  We can build bigger and more fluid collections that can reach our patrons more places than ever before- in real time.  But we have to have the right model.  It needs to be patron driven, it needs to be library managed (rather than publisher or vendor) and it needs to happen now.
 
 
I spoke this morning at the High Plains library district staff development day.  For an hour we talked about ebooks, ereaders, and the future of libraries.  It was a very energizing experience with a great group of people who get it.  I had a long drive back to the office, so I got to think about the experience and what I can take away from it.  The biggest problem is still isolation.  We are inventing the wheel a hundred different times all over America instead of working together.  Forget working together, we need to just communicate for a start.  It looks like that is happening, but we need more of it.  This group gets it, they got the whole picture, and why we need to push for libraries controlling their data rather than subscription and license models.
It seems like I have spoken with people across the nation on this topic multiple times over the past few months, and we are always on the same "page."  But the network doesn't exist yet to support us all...