700 terabytes of data in a single gram of DNA- what will archivists and catalogers do?  A bioengineer and geneticist at Harvard managed to take one of their most recent books, store it, replicate it 70 billion times and retrieve it, albeit fairly slowly from a DNA strand.

There are not enough catalogers and archivists on the planet to deal with this amount of content.  While librarians should be at the forefront of this cultural and social discussion, I have a hard time imagining that there are many even considering the challenges of Big Data and what we will do with the massive amount of organizable and mineable content out there.  Obviously, this work will have to automated, but the problem is that human intelligence is necessary at so many levels, as much of this data will be original data.  A machine intelligence might also begin ignoring duplicate patterns that would have potential value to a human mind.  Machine intelligence cannot make the ethical decisions involved in this type and amount of data either.

Here is a great little video clip of the scientists who pulled this off:

 
 
I was part of a an eSummit in New Jersey last week that was absolutely phenomenal- probably the best event I have been part of to date.  One of the presenters was Eli Neiburger, who has a similar vision for the future of libraries and digital content.  One of his main points was that old distribution models and business models are dying.  For example, see this article on the distribution A Lonely Place for Dying. 

What are libraries supposed to do in such an evolving market?  The 3M book cloud sounds nice, but we still need to keep a long term vision of libraries controlling their content with their patrons and paying a fair market price for it.  Eli's point is great, but it will not be so clean and easy getting there.  In the meantime, libraries need to remember that they have to get from here to there with minimal damage and loss of services.  The main focus is keeping content affordable and available.
 
 
I just pushed a book one of our patrons wanted to his personal iPad that I synced to my Kindle cloud as a sort of beta test.  In addition to circulating about 30 ereaders that the library owns,and managing about 100 institutional iPads that have the Library's Kindle account on them, I have also installed my Kindle account on about 10 personal devices.  This group of people who have it are part of my beta test group who help me with all kinds of thorny questions and experiments.

Why would I sync an account to a privately owned device?  Well, because the answer to ebooks is not hardware based.  It's software.  Librarians are always asking me which ereader they should adopt, which company to work with, and my answer is, "It depends on your strategic vision and personal preferences."  Because that question is irrelevant if we have the right software.  I am working towards a scenario where libraries own their own ebooks.  By "own" I mean host their content where they choose.  If they choose the Amazon cloud, so be it, but they could also host the content on their own servers (theoretically).  The real issue is delivery and content management.

My vision is that libraries will be able to compete with Google by offering delivery to every device and patron at the moment of need- or want.  The gentleman I just delivered a nonfiction book to was in a meeting, heard about a book that sounded valuable, emailed me the title, and I pushed the book to his particular iPad immediately.

The value of this type of management model cannot be overemphasized. I have been using these devices for four year now with our patrons.  Ebooks and readers have so much potential for improving our services on so many levels, but their ability to make us competitive again is what really matters.  Google cannot get my patron the book immediately unless he buys it himself.  Many patrons are loath to do this, but I am willing to buy the titles because we are a library and are always buying titles.  By creating a crowd sourced patron driven acquisition model, and syncing personal devices to the library cloud we are suddenly able to deliver a service other electronic services and resources cannot.  This is the libraries advantage over browsers and the internet in the new ebook world, and this is why I have been experimenting with syncing my account to personal devices.

It also does wonders for our image.  The library on campus is now one of the main "go to" places.  We are faster, more fluid, and give our patrons a collective power they lack on their own.  People expect the library to have answers and ideas before anyone or any other institution on campus.  Creating a new image for libraries is obviously important, and we want one that is powerful and pleasing to our patrons.  I cannot tell you how many times I have seen one of these types of transactions take place, and seen a new understanding of the library dawn on the face of the patron we helped.  I expect to see it now.

This is one of the advantages ebooks offer libraries.  We can build bigger and more fluid collections that can reach our patrons more places than ever before- in real time.  But we have to have the right model.  It needs to be patron driven, it needs to be library managed (rather than publisher or vendor) and it needs to happen now.